Which of the following is NOT a requirement after a pesticide application?

The correct response highlights that a detailed description of the applicator's experience is not a requirement after a pesticide application. When documenting pesticide applications, regulatory guidelines typically focus on specific data that relates directly to the application and its immediate circumstances.

The reason for this is that the key information collected post-application is intended to inform about the conditions under which the pesticide was applied and to facilitate any necessary follow-ups regarding efficacy or safety. Data such as the crop or site treated ensures that the pesticide applied is appropriate for the target area, while recording the weather conditions is crucial, as this can significantly affect the effectiveness of the pesticide and the potential for drift or other unintended consequences. Lastly, the date and time of application provide a timeline that is essential for tracking pesticide efficacy and safety over time, especially regarding any potential residues or environmental impacts.

In contrast, while the applicator's experience may be relevant in certain contexts, it does not constitute necessary documentation related to the application itself and its immediate effects on the environment or the target organisms. Therefore, it is correctly identified as the information that is not required after a pesticide application.